NOKUT's study barometer has revealed a dramatic increase in the use of artificial intelligence (AI) among students, from 61 percent in 2023 to a striking 81 percent in 2024. Nevertheless, the survey shows that 67 percent of students do not receive adequate training in AI tools. This is a serious situation that highlights the significant gap between students' needs and the support provided by educational institutions.
StInn Demands Better AI Training
The Inland Norway Student's Union (StInn) supports NSO's demand that educational institutions take responsibility for ensuring proper and equitable AI training. This aligns with StInn's academics and research policy platform, where we emphasize the importance of an updated and inclusive educational offering.
Our policy states that students must have access to education that prepares them for the future job market, where AI will play a crucial role now and in the future. It is unacceptable that some student groups receive training and guidance, while others are left to fend for themselves. This creates significant disparities in education and in students' ability to succeed in the workforce.
AI as a Resource – Not a Replacement
StInn believes that AI should be a tool that enhances students' learning processes, not a replacement for critical thinking and academic skills. For this to happen, institutions must develop clear guidelines for AI use and offer courses on the ethical and academically responsible application of the technology.
StInn has been and continues to be in dialogue with the leadership at the University of Inland Norway to discuss how these improvements can be implemented. We are actively working to ensure that students receive the necessary AI training and that the institution takes responsibility for facilitating a fair and skill-building academic environment.
Fair Grading and Feedback
Our key issue is timely when we consider grading and feedback. The quality of assessments and feedback is crucial for students' academic development, and we believe that this must be prioritized by educational institutions.
StInn believes that feedback on coursework and assessed exams should be of such quality that it is easy for the student to understand their academic standing, areas for improvement, and whether they are on the verge of moving up or down a grade in the event of an appeal. AI should not be used to generate feedback.